Impact of the quality of resected thyroid cancer tissue sample on next-generation sequencing testing.

Activating rearranged during transfection (RET) proto-oncogene alterations can be identified using next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor DNA/RNA. We assessed factors associated with NGS (Oncomine Dx Target Test [ODxTT]) success for resected thyroid cancer (TC) specimens, including sample age, processing conditions, and DNA/RNA quality. TC samples were from three Japanese hospitals, with sample age <1-<10 years, fixative 10%/15% neutralized buffered formalin (NBF), and fixation time ≤48 h/>48 h-≤72 h. NGS success rate was defined as the percentage of samples returning validated NGS results (RET fusion-positive/negative [RNA] or RET mutation-positive/negative [DNA], detected using ODxTT). DNA/RNA quality was assessed with indexes based on electrophoresis (DNA/RNA integrity number, DV200 ) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (DNA/RNA integrity score [ddCq/ΔCq]). NGS success rate (N = 202) was 90%/93% (DNA/RNA) overall, 98%-100% (DNA and RNA) for samples <3 years old, and 91% (DNA and RNA) for samples ≥3-<5 years old fixed in 10% NBF for ≤48 h. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ddCq and ΔCq as significant predictors of DNA and RNA NGS success rates, respectively. Quality assessment of nucleic acid extracted from archival tissue samples is important for achieving high NGS success rates in clinical practice, especially for samples ≥3 years old.

[Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Selpercatinib in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Results from the Japanese Subset of a Global Phase 1/2 Study].

PURPOSE: Selpercatinib is a highly selective, potent, rearranged during transfection(RET)inhibitor. A global, multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study of selpercatinib(LIBRETTO-001, NCT03157128)has been ongoing since 2017. We evaluated the data of Japanese patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)using 30 March 2020 cut-off data. METHODS: Phase 2 of LIBRETTO-001 started after confirming the safety of the recommended phase 2 dose(160 mg bid, orally, 28-day cycles)in Japanese. The primary endpoint was the independently assessed objective response rate(RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: Japanese NSCLC patients, including 44 patients in cohort 1 who had previously received platinum-based(or other)chemotherapy, programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 immunotherapy, or both, and four previously untreated patients in cohort 2, were analyzed. The objective response rate was 55.3%(95% confidence interval: 38.3, 71.4; one confirmed complete response, 20 confirmed partial responses)in 38 evaluable patients in cohort 1 who could be followed for ≥2 post-baseline scans. The only evaluable patient in cohort 2 had no response. The most frequent treatment- emergent adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Selpercatinib appeared to be effective in Japanese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and the safety profile was not substantially different from published results.

Japanese subgroup analysis of the phase 3 MONARCH 3 study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This was a Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 3, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) for initial therapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Eligibility included postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced disease setting. Patients (N = 493) were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg) plus either 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole (physician's choice). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS: In Japan, 53 patients were randomized (abemaciclib, n = 38; placebo, n = 15). At final PFS analysis (November 3, 2017), median PFS was 29.1 and 14.9 months in the abemaciclib and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio 0.537; 95% confidence interval 0.224-1.289). ORR in measurable disease was 62.1 and 50.0% in the abemaciclib and placebo groups, respectively. The Japanese PK profile was comparable to that of the overall population. Consistent with prior studies, the most frequent adverse events reported were diarrhea (abemaciclib: any grade, 94.7%; grade ≥ 3, 10.5%; placebo: any grade, 46.7%; grade ≥ 3, 0%) and neutropenia (abemaciclib: any grade, 68.4%; grade ≥ 3, 21.1%; placebo: any grade, 0%). HRQoL outcomes were generally similar between treatments except for the diarrhea score, which favored placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with findings in the overall population, abemaciclib plus NSAI was an effective initial treatment in the Japanese subpopulation, with a manageable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02246621; U.S. National Library of Medicine: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02246621 .

Clinical Impact of a Shortened Infusion Duration of Ramucirumab in Japanese Patients -A Model-Based Approach.

AIM: We evaluated the safety and potential clinical impact of shortened ramucirumab infusion in Japanese patients from clinical studies. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess any association between infusion rate and increased risk of an immediate infusion-related reaction(IRR). Population pharmacokinetic modeling was used to simulate concentration-time profiles and exposure parameters following a 30- or 60-minute infusion with ramucirumab. RESULTS: From 8 pooled ramucirumab clinical studies, 55 of 559(9.8%)Japanese patients experienced at least one immediate IRR(any grade). When grouped according to infusion rate quartile, the incidence of immediate any-grade IRR was similar across quartiles. Infusion rate was not significantly associated with an increased risk of an immediate IRR; odds ratio per 1 mg/min increase was 0.912, 95% confidence interval 0.724 to 1.149, p=0.436. Patients aged ≥65 years may have a reduced risk of an immediate IRR compared with those aged <65 years, and premedication use was also associated with a reduced risk. Ramucirumab pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable following a 30- or 60-minute infusion. CONCLUSIONS: A shortened infusion duration of ramucirumab is unlikely to affect the efficacy or safety profile in Japanese patients and may be clinically beneficial for patients and health care providers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: RAINBOW-NCT01170663, RAISE- NCT01183780, REACH-NCT01140347, REACH-2-NCT02435433, RAINFALL-NCT02314117, RANGE-NCT02426125, RELAY-NCT02411448, I4T-MC-JVCG-NCT01703091.

Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2: phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant for treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: This was a Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Eligible women had progressed on (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from end of adjuvant ET, or on first-line ET for ABC, and had not received chemotherapy for ABC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety. RESULTS: In Japan, 95 patients were randomized (abemaciclib, n = 64; placebo, n = 31). At final PFS analysis (February 14, 2017), median PFS was 21.2 and 14.3 months, respectively, in the abemaciclib and placebo groups (hazard ratio: 0.672; 95% confidence interval: 0.380-1.189). Abemaciclib had a higher objective response rate (37.5%) than placebo (12.9%). PK and safety profiles for Japanese patients were consistent with those of the overall population, without clinically meaningful differences across most HRQoL dimensions evaluated. The most frequent adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo groups were diarrhea (95.2 versus 25.8%), neutropenia (79.4 versus 0%), and leukopenia (66.7 versus 0%). At a second data cutoff (June 20, 2019), median OS was not reached with abemaciclib and 47.3 months with placebo (hazard ratio: 0.755; 95% confidence interval: 0.390-1.463). CONCLUSIONS: Results of the Japanese subpopulation were consistent with the improved clinical outcomes and manageable safety profile observed in the overall population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02107703; U.S. National Library of Medicine: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02107703 .

A phase 1 study of crenigacestat (LY3039478), the Notch inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Background This phase 1, single-center, nonrandomized, single-arm, open-label, dose-escalation study, evaluated the tolerability of crenigacestat, a γ-secretase inhibitor as an oral Notch inhibitor in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods The study consisted of 2 dose levels of crenigacestat (25 mg and 50 mg), administered orally 3 times per week (TIW) over a 28-day cycle until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, or any other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary objective was to evaluate the tolerability and determine the recommended dose of crenigacestat for Japanese patients. Secondary objectives were to characterize the safety and toxicity, the pharmacokinetic parameters, and to document any antitumor activity of crenigacestat. Results Eleven Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled; 4 patients (median age of 64 years) received 25 mg of crenigacestat, and 7 patients (median age of 72 years) received 50 mg of crenigacestat. Median treatment duration was 8 weeks in the 25-mg treatment arm and 4 weeks in the 50-mg treatment arm. There were no dose-limiting toxicities or dose-limiting equivalent toxicities observed. None of the patients had a complete or partial response to the treatment. One patient (14.3%) with a desmoid tumor in the 50-mg treatment arm showed tumor size shrinkage of 22.4% and had stable disease for 22.5 months. Frequent (>14%) treatment-related-adverse events in both treatment arms included diarrhea, malaise, and vomiting. Conclusions Crenigacestat was tolerated in Japanese patients but with limited clinical activity. The recommended crenigacestat dose in Japanese patients is 50 mg TIW.Trial registration: NCT02836600 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) registered on July 19, 2016.

Phase 1 study of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in Japanese patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.

Olaratumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting human platelet-derived growth factor receptor α, plus doxorubicin significantly improved overall survival in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in a prior phase 1b/2 randomized trial. Subsequent exposure-response analysis suggested that higher olaratumab exposures earlier might improve outcomes in patients at risk of early disease progression. This phase 1 study (3 treatment cohorts; minimum 6 patients each) investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of olaratumab plus doxorubicin in Japanese patients with STS. Patients received olaratumab 15 mg/kg on Days 1 and 8 during each 21-day cycle until disease progression. Patients in Cohort 3 received a 20 mg/kg loading dose of olaratumab in Cycle 1. Doxorubicin was administered for up to 6 cycles. Patients in Cohort 1 received doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2 and 3. Patients in Cohorts 2 and 3 received doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 on Day 1. One patient in Cohort 2 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity of Grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were of mild and moderate severity, and were known doxorubicin toxicities. Olaratumab serum concentrations in Cohort 3 reached a steady-state exceeding the target level in Cycle 1. Partial response was confirmed in 4 patients (2 each in Cohorts 2 and 3). Olaratumab plus doxorubicin had an acceptable safety profile in patients with STS. A loading dose of olaratumab 20 mg/kg was effective for achieving minimum serum concentrations above the target trough level in Cycle 1.

Phase 1 study of abemaciclib, an inhibitor of CDK 4 and 6, as a single agent for Japanese patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: To confirm the safety and tolerability, evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), and investigate the antitumor activity of abemaciclib in Japanese patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized, single-arm, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 study of abemaciclib administered orally every 12 h (Q12H) on a 28-day cycle at doses of 100 mg (Cohort 1, n = 3), 150 mg (Cohort 2, n = 3), or 200 mg [Cohort 3, n = 6, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)]. Dose escalation was based on the frequency of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). MTD, as established in the previous phase 1 study in non-Japanese patients, was the highest dose level at which <33 % of patients experienced DLT. RESULTS: Eleven of the 12 patients who received treatment with abemaciclib discontinued: 10 patients due to progressive disease, and 1 due to a DLT (Cohort 3, grade 2 nausea). Diarrhea, the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), was managed supportively and did not require study treatment discontinuation. There were no drug-related serious AEs and no patients with corrected QT (QTc) > 480 ms or QTc change of >60 ms from baseline. The abemaciclib PK profile was characterized by slow absorption and high PK variability after single or repeated doses. Two patients, one with breast cancer and one with neuroendocrine tumor, experienced >30 % decrease in tumor size from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with advanced cancer, single-agent abemaciclib has an acceptable safety profile and demonstrates antitumor activity at a dose of 200 mg Q12H. These findings support ongoing development of abemaciclib for diverse populations with advanced cancer.

A powerful test for Balaam's design.

The crossover trial design (AB/BA design) is often used to compare the effects of two treatments in medical science because it performs within-subject comparisons, which increase the precision of a treatment effect (i.e., a between-treatment difference). However, the AB/BA design cannot be applied in the presence of carryover effects and/or treatments-by-period interaction. In such cases, Balaam's design is a more suitable choice. Unlike the AB/BA design, Balaam's design inflates the variance of an estimate of the treatment effect, thereby reducing the statistical power of tests. This is a serious drawback of the design. Although the variance of parameter estimators in Balaam's design has been extensively studied, the estimators of the treatment effect to improve the inference have received little attention. If the estimate of the treatment effect is obtained by solving the mixed model equations, the AA and BB sequences are excluded from the estimation process. In this study, we develop a new estimator of the treatment effect and a new test statistic using the estimator. The aim is to improve the statistical inference in Balaam's design. Simulation studies indicate that the type I error of the proposed test is well controlled, and that the test is more powerful and has more suitable characteristics than other existing tests when interactions are substantial. The proposed test is also applied to analyze a real dataset.

Latent class models for medical diagnostic tests in multicenter trials.

Medical diagnostic tests must enjoy appropriate validity and high reliability in order to qualify as adequate assessment tools. Without a gold standard test, available medical diagnostic tests are not perfect; hence, the reliability of such tests must be evaluated precisely. Kappa coefficient statistics are often utilized to assess reliability of tests when there are two or more medical diagnostic tests. However, the statistics are imprecise for a typical case when the prevalence rate of a target disease is unknown. Although latent class models could be used to assess reliability, the models cannot estimate reliability in the case of two tests, due to unidentifiability or the lack of degrees of freedom. An alternative approach to assess reliability for the case of two tests is stratifying a two-by-two contingency table under the assumption that sensitivities and specificities between the two tests be equal over all strata and that prevalence rates in the strata be different from each other. Because stratification is basically a multi-sample analysis, it should not be applied to the situation where subsamples (i.e., centers) are randomly selected from a larger population. In this article, a type of mixed-effect model is proposed to evaluate the reliability of two tests for trials in randomly selected multiple centers. Several types of distributions for prevalence rates over subpopulations are considered. Simulation studies show that our proposed method performs nicely. Analysis of real data is also reported.

A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the rivastigmine patch in Japanese patients with Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: As of 2010, the rivastigmine patch was licensed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in 64 countries. METHODS: This 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the 5-cm(2) (9-mg loading dose; 4.6 mg/24 h delivery rate) and 10-cm(2) (18-mg loading dose; 9.5 mg/24 h delivery rate) rivastigmine patch in Japanese patients with AD. RESULTS: In the primary analysis population (intent-to-treat last observation carried forward) at week 24, delayed deterioration was seen with the 10-cm(2) patch versus placebo on the Japanese version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog; p = 0.005) and the Japanese version of the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC plus-J; p = 0.067). Participants receiving the rivastigmine patch showed numerically less decline versus placebo at week 24 on the CIBIC plus-J, although this did not reach statistical significance. Statistical significance for the CIBIC plus-J was met following adjustment for body weight and baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score as dynamic allocation factors (p = 0.042) and on the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD; p = 0.024) and Mental Function Impairment (MENFIS; p = 0.016) subscales. Serious adverse events were rare and were consistent with the known safety profile of the rivastigmine patch. CONCLUSION: The rivastigmine patch has a favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in Japanese patients with AD.